Reading the posts in a chronological order is recommended.

martes, 29 de septiembre de 2015

IGNORANCE AND ARROGANCE

Authorities – religious or scientific – are not reknown for their humility. On the contrary, they are often arrogant and find it difficult to admit that they don’t understand certain ideas. Hans Christian Anderson’s story of the Emperor’s Suit explains very well how intellectuals can fool themselves. When the emperor’s tailor says that he has made a suit for the emperor from a special material that only intelligent people can see, all praise its beauty although the tailor hadn’t used any fabric at all. It is therefore a child that points out that the emperor walks around naked.
Wisdom requires humility. To be able to discover the answer to certain mysteries, we first have to recognize that there are mysteries; that there are things that we do not yet understand. Ignorance and arrogance often together. People who can’t accept there are ideas that they do not immediately understand either ignore them, consider that they make no sense, or give them an unsatisfactory explanation (by creating a dogma or an axioma).
The fact that Saint Matthew and Saint Luke offer different genealogies for Jesus baffles Bible scholars. Sceptics and cynics claim it proves the New Testament makes no sense. Theologians try to give these genealogies sense by claiming that one traces Jesus’ ancestors through his mother’s side and the other through his father’s side, but that is not what they say. Furthermore, how do they explain that both genealogies offer different names for the father of Joseph, Mary’s husband?

A lot of people immediately assume that one or even both genealogies are false. Only the careful reader who is aware that because of extramarital relations some lineages are real and others are supposed (the husband of our mother is not necessarily our father) realizes that the Bible recognizes this fact. Saint Matthew offers Jesus’ real lineage, because he bases it on the ‘father begot son’ principle (but he ends with, “Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary who gave birth to Jesus”), Saint Luke offers Jesus’ supposed lineage, because he starts it with, “Jesus was believed to be the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of…”  Saint Luke not only points out that people believed Joseph was Jesus’ father, but also that they believed Heli was Joseph’s father and that explains why both genealogies offer a different father for Joseph.

lunes, 28 de septiembre de 2015

DO ONLY PROFESSORS USE THEIR BRAIN?

Not only professors, but whoever has an inquisitive mind, and dedicates himself to research, can make interesting discoveries. People who are self-taught, like myself, find it however extremely difficult to broadcast their conclusions. People trust authorities, but distrust those who are self-taught. It is, of course, much easier to recognize someone as an authority and accept his ideas, than having to reflect upon ideas oneself or having to figure out whether the ideas of someone who is self-taught make sense or not.
Since people idolize authority – a scholar, a religious leader, etc. – I would like to point out that Albert Einstein, an authority, said, “Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.“ and “Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the lifelong attempt to acquiere it.” He also said, “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing.”
When I came across Albert Einstein’s quotes, a bit more than a year ago, I felt like I finally found someone who understood me. I am passionately curious and question authority. Therefore, instead of simply rejecting an idea that makes little sense – Jesus’ virgin birth –, like sceptics and cynics do, I have studied where Christianity got that idea from and thus discovered that it has its origin in a misinterpretation of an enigma in the Gospel of Saint Matthew.

Jesus said, “The truth will set you free”. That makes sense because the belief in a falacy – the idea that Jesus was born of a virgin, for instance – is really the belief in the authority that defends that falacy, which makes one recognize that authority as a master and oneself as a slave.

domingo, 27 de septiembre de 2015

TWO TYPES OF IGNORANCE

People who ignore something are not stupid. Einstein said, “We are all ignorant, but not all ignorant of the same things’. What is stupid, is to ignore information deliberately.
When one reads the first lines of the New Testament, it is easy to ignore that the four women – Rahab, Ruth, Batsheba and Tamar – that Saint Matthew mentions in the genealogy of Jesus all had extramarital relations. Not everybody who reads Saint Matthew is of course familiar with the stories of the Old Testament. When one is however aware of this, it is stupid to ignore that Saint Matthew found it important to point out that four of Jesus’ ancestors had relations with adulterous women.
When one reads the first chapter of the New Testament, it is easy to ignore that it holds an enigma. Not everybody who reads at the end of the genealogy of Jesus: “there are fourteen generations from Abraham to David, from David to the deportation to Babylon and from the deportation to Babylon to Jesus Christ” makes a list of these names and divides them in three columns of 14 generations, thus discovering that the traditional way for doing so (Abraham/David, David/Josiah, and Jechoniah/Jesus is inconsistent, since in the second column it repeats David, but does not do the same with Josiah in the third column. When one however knows this, it is stupid to ignore that the consistent way for dividing the genealogies – Abraham/David, David/Josiah/ and Josiah/Joseph+Jesus –means that Jacob first begot Joseph and later, when Joseph grew up, had Jesus from Joseph’s wife (Mary). And when also is aware of the fact that Judah, a direct ancestor of Jesus, had Perez from his daughter-in-law Tamar, one has to be real stupid to ignore that Saint Matthew tells us that Mary had Jesus from her father-in-law.

When one reads the New Testament, it is easy to ignore that Jesus never said he was born of a virgin; that two of the official gospels – Saint Mark and Saint John – do not refer to Jesus’ virgin birth; that Saint Paul, who supposedly wrote half of the books that compose the New Testament, does not mention this and even contradicts it by pointing out that Jesus was a descendant of David ‘according to the flesh’ (Rm1:3); and that the two official gospels – Saint Matthew and Saint Luke – that do mention there is a mystery regarding Jesus’ birth, offer different genealogies for Jesus. When one is however aware of this, it is stupid not to wonder where the idea of Jesus’ virgin birth really comes from.

miércoles, 23 de septiembre de 2015

A CERTIFIED LETTER SENT TO THE POPE

                                                                                     September 23rd of 2015

Dear Sir,

I am contacting you with a request. I have discovered something surprising about religion (the Bible) and since you are an authority and I am self-taught I would like to ask you to evaluate whether what I've found makes sense or not.
I will be short. I think to be able to demonstrate, in only10 steps, that the dogma of Jesus’ Virgin Birth stems from a misinterpretation of an 'enigma' in the Gospel of Matthew which actually tells us who was Jesus’ father:
1) We can not find in the New Testament (NT) that Jesus ever claimed to have been born of a virgin.
2) Paul, who wrote half of the books of the NT, does not mention Jesus’ Virgin Birth and even contradicts it by saying that Jesus was a descendant of David "according to the flesh" (Rm1 :. 3)
3) Two of the four official gospels – Mark and John – do not mention Jesus’ Virgin Birth and the two gospels that do refer to a mystery regarding Jesus’ birth - Matthew and Luke - offer different genealogies (Mt1: 1-17 /Lk: 23-38).
4) Because of extramarital affairs some lineages are  real and others supposed: the father of a child is not necessarily the mother's partner. The genealogies in the Bible recognize this reality: the real lineages are based on the 'father begot son' principle while the supposed lineages use formulas such as "Cain knew his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to..." or "Jesus was, as was believed, the son of ..."
5) Matthew mentions in his genealogy for Jesus four women - Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba and Tamar - and we find in the Old Testament that all had extramarital affairs. Tamar had Peres from Judah, her father-in-law. (Gn38) This information prepares us for what we will discover about Jesus’ parents.
6) Matthew’s genealogy for Jesus is based on the 'father begat a son' principle, but ends with, "... Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born. So the amount of generations is: 14 from Abraham to David, 14 from David to the Babylonian deportation; and 14 from the Babylonian deportation to Jesus.
7) The traditional division is: Abraham/David, David/Josiah and Jeconiah/Jesus. But when we repeat David in the second column, we must do the same with Josiah in the third column. And since Josiah marks the Babylonian deportation, and there are 14 generations from him to Joseph, the fact that Matthew says there are 14 generations from the Babylonian deportation to Jesus, means that Joseph and Jesus belong to the same generation: Jacob first had Joseph, and later, when this son reached adulthood, he had Jesus from Joseph's wife (his daughter-in-law), just like generations earlier Judah had Peres from his daughter-in-law (Tamar).
8) In case Jesus was the son of Jacob, he was a descendant of David and Matthew's genealogy makes sense: it traces Jesus’ lineage back to David, because the Messiah was supposed to be a descendant of him; it lists 4 adulterous women because Jesus was born from an extramarital relationship; it ends with 'Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born' and invites us to divide the generations in groups of 14 to enable us to discover that Joseph and Jesus were brothers. Besides, Matthew had  a reason for hiding this information: the Jews stoned adulterers to death and did not respect bastard children.
9) This enigma should not surprise us because a) calling the Bible a  'sacred' book originally meant to recognize that it guards secrets (the words 'sacred' and 'secret' have the same origin: they come from the verb 'to segregate'; because b) the word 'religion', which comes from the Latin word 'relegere' and means ‘to re-read’, an also ‘to reunite’ (religare), refers to reading the Bible again and again in order to discover its secrets; and because c), according to an ancient Jewish tradition someone who is enlightened is able to create a mystery that many generations later reveals its secrets and this is the case of the Bible.
10) When the Gospels made their appearance, the Christian authorities were no longer descendants of Jews, who were familiar with books that guard secrets, but instead of pagans, who were familiar with pagan ideas such as, for instance, that of a god who is born of a virgin. And when they read in Matthew: "..María was betrothed to Joseph, but before they came to live together she was found to be with child through the Holy Spirit", they assumed that this meant that Mary had Jesus without having a sexual relationship. And when they read, "Now all this took place to fulfil what the Lord had spoken through the prophet: "Look the virgin is with child and will give birth to a son whom they will call Immanuel, a name which means "God-is-with-us", they believed it confirmed their assumption. Therefore, they thought that Matthew said: "... Jacob begat Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born" and that Luke said, "... Jesus was, believed to be, the son of Joseph" to indicate that he was not the son of Joseph, but of an angel.
Twenty years have passed since I discovered that Matthew says that Jesus was born of a relationship between Mary and her father-in-law. Now it  is time that the world knows of my findings. Therefore, I am asking several authorities to evaluate my hypothesis. I am contacting Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the pope, because the Vatican has the best collection of Sacred Scriptures; Munib A. Younan, President of the Lutheran World Federation, because protestants believe in the sufficiency and authority of the Holy Scriptures; George Soros, because he studied philosophy and philosophers seek the truth, Sebastien Fath, because as a professor of history he has studied religion; and Xosé Luís Vilela Conde, the director of La Voz de Galicia, because newspapers evaluate news and decide what news is published.
In previous attempts to share my findings, someone claimed that one can find in the Bible whatever one wants to find. I consider that one can ignore in the Bible – and in life in general – whatever one wants to ignore. And should someone who ignores certain information deliberately not be called ‘ignorant’ (stupid)?
I would appreciate it if you evaluated my hypothesis as soon as possible. I hope that this Christmas people know the truth and reflect upon all the questions that my discovery entails. The most important questions are, “Who created this enigma?” and “Why does this enigma reveals its secrets now?”
Sincerely,


Bruno Lernout

sábado, 27 de junio de 2015

THE CAMINO DE SANTIAGO MESSAGES



AT RIBADISO / KM 39,5

1. FOOD FOR THOUGHT
2. THERE IS FAST FOOD, BUT THERE IS NO FAST WISDOM.
3. TO GRASP CERTAIN IDEAS, WE HAVE TO BE READY FOR THEM.
4. WE REGARD OURSELVES AT THE HEAD OF CREATION, BUT POLLUTE IT AND ARE CLOSE TO DESTROYING IT.
5. TO GUARANTEE MANKIND’S SURVIVAL WE HAVE TO DISCOVER WHY WE HAVE CONFLICTS WITH EACH OTHER AND WITH OUR ENVIRONMENT.
6.TO BE ABLE TO SOLVE A PROBLEM, WE FIRST HAVE TO ACCEPT THAT WE HAVE A PROBLEM.
7.IMITATING THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE OSTRICH IS NOT THE BEST WAY OF DEALING WITH DANGER SITUATIONS.
8.THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF OUR CONFLICTS IS A BAD UNDERSTANDING OF OURSELVES AND THE FORCES THAT GOVERN THE UNIVERSE.
9.A BAD UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY DIVIDES PEOPLE. A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY BRINGS PEOPLE BACK TOGETHER.
10. A GOOD PERCEPTION OF REALITY ENABLES US TO SEE ALL CAUSES AND ALL CONSECUENCES
OF OUR BEHAVIOUR
11.HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF WHEN WE DO NOT LEARN EVERYTHING THERE IS TO LEARN FROM OUR EXPERIENCES.
12. WHAT ALTERS OUR PERCEPTION OF REALITY? WHAT MAKES US FOCUS SO MUCH ON CERTAIN
ASPECTS THAT WE IGNORE OTHERS?
13.A HEALTHY BODY AND MIND REQUIRE A HEALTHY DIET. DRUGS ARE LIKE MEDICINE. INSTEAD OF
TAKING THEM, WE SHOULD ASK WHAT MAKES US SICK.
14. MORE PHILOSOPHY ON KM 32





AT TABERNA VELLA/ KM 32

TRAVEL BROADENS OUR MIND
-Not all those who wander are lost. Tolkien
-The world is a book and those who don’t travel only read one page. Saint Augustine
-The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step. Lao Tse
-A good traveller has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving. Lao Tse
-Travel is fatal for prejudice and narrow-mindedness. Mark Twain
-It is good to have an end to journey toward but it is the journey that matters in the end. Ernest Hemingway
-Travel makes one modest. You see what a tiny place you occupy in the world. Flaubert
-We may sit in our library and yet be in all quarters of the earth. John Lubbock

ARE YOU A SEEKER?
-Do you question own ideas (beliefs) as much as you do other people’s ideas (beliefs)?
-Has religion had a positive or negative influence on our society?
-Is science bringing us salvation or self-destruction?
-Have perhaps all religions and philosophies safeguarded important values?
-Do you believe in God because your parents do, or do you not believe in God because your friends do not?
-Would you be an atheist if you lived in a communist country and a Buddhist if you lived in a Buddhist country?
-Are heaven and hell (purgatory, reincarnation, etc.) only for people who believe in them?
-If the founders of our religions came back, would they recognize their work?
-Imagine Jesus came back. Would he be a Baptist, a Catholic, a Greek Orthodox...?


SEEKERS & HARMONY
1: Seekers long for a better comprehension.
They question themselves as much as others,
and religion as much as science.
               
2: “Of all the communities available, the society
of the true seekers is the only one I want to
devote myself to.” Albert Einstein.
       
3: Both believers and cynics are more interested
in justifying themselves and demonstrating
their ideas are right than in seeking the truth.
       
4: There is nothing wrong with religion or science,
but with what we think they are; with how we
interpret religion and science.
       
5: Science studies the world we live in; religion (lt.
re-legere: re-read) studies ‘sacred books’ (books
that hold secrets) about the world we live in.
       
6: The most important lesson we have to learn is
that a society that doesn’t live in harmony is
bound to destroy itself.
       
7: Genesis recognizes this reality: 10 generations
after putting an end to harmony, a catastrophe
almost put an end to humanity.

8: A problem that appears to have no solution
causes too much stress, and people therefore
ignore reality.
                       
9: To avoid our self-destruction, we have to ask
why we have conflicts or what the Forbidden
Fruit refers to.
               
10: Bible scholars ignore what Genesis is about
because they do not ask all the important ques-
tions this book encourages the reader to ask.  

11: It is only now, that we are able to destroy our-selves,
that we can understand the ultimate
cause and effect of not living in harmony.

12: We have conflicts with other people and with our
environment because of an incomplete understanding,
arising from a bad perception of reality.

13: A bad understanding of reality (not seeing all
causes and effects) divides people. A good
understanding of reality unites them again.
       
14: All philosophies and religions have safeguarded
important ideas that help us to understand ourselves
and the forces that govern the universe.
  

ALBERT EINSTEIN QUOTES:
• “We are all ignorant, but not all ignorant of the same things.”
• “Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
• “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”
• “I have always eaten animal flesh with a somewhat guilty conscience.”
• “Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet.”
• “I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.”
• “A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?”
• “Without deep reflection one knows from daily life that one exists for other people.”
• “Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile.”
• “Everyone should be respected as an individual, but no one idolized.”
• “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age 18.”
• “I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice.”
• “Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.”
• “If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.”
• “It was the experience of mystery - even if mixed with fear - that engendered religion.”
• “The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.”

• “Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.”
• “It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.”
• “The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”
• “If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?”
• “Scientific research can reduce superstition by encouraging people to think and view things in terms of cause and effect. “
• “Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.”
• “The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.”
•“To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science.”
• “The only real valuable thing is intuition.”
• “If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.”
• “Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses prevent them.”
• “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing.”
• “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.”
• “Of all the communities available to us, there is not one I would want to devote myself to except for the society of the true seekers, which has very few living members at any one time.”



lunes, 25 de mayo de 2015

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, PLEASE MAY I INTRODUCE TO YOU:

GOD OR THE FORCES THAT GOVERN THE UNIVERSE
When we reflect upon mankind’s evolution, we see that weapons have continually become more sophisticated and that nowadays there are arms of mass-destruction. We also see that continually a smaller percentage of the world population has gotten hold of a larger percentage of all available resources, thus increasing the tension between the different groups of people and between them and their environment. Therefore, we can come to the conclusion that a society that doesn’t live in harmony, like ours, is eventually bound to destroy itself.
It is the most important lesson mankind has to learn. It does not mean that we are bound to destroy ourselves, but that to guarantee our survival we must put an end to our conflicts and therefore discover why we have conflicts with the other people and with our environment.
Whereas our intellectuals – scientists, philosophers, politicians, theologians – ignore this, Genesis, which is at the origin of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, recognizes this reality: 10 generations after putting an end to harmony (Paradise), our ancestors almost completely destroyed themselves (the Great Flood). Since Genesis says our ancestors put an end to harmony by eating a forbidden fruit, we have a good reason for studying this book: asking why we have conflicts is the same as asking what the forbidden fruit refers to.
Genesis is a book of wisdom. It encourages us to ask questions whose answers lead to new questions, and this dynamic enables us to discover its secrets and reflect upon mankind’s true nature. Its main protagonist is God or the forces that govern the universe. With God’s main characteristic being the principle of cause and effect, the belief in God is really the belief in the principle of cause and effect.
Whereas the ultimate effect of not living in harmony is mankind’s self-destruction, its ultimate cause was a change in people’s diet: Adam and Eve were vegetarians before they ate the forbidden fruit. Eating the forbidden fruit made our ancestors get a bad understanding of God. Whereas, a bad understanding of the forces that govern the universe – not seeing all the consequences of our behavior – divides people, a good understanding of the forces that govern the universe – seeing all the consequences of our behavior – brings people back together.
The fact that a society that doesn’t live in harmony is eventually bound to destroy itself, teaches us that we are all on the same boat, and if that sinks, all people – rich and poor, good and bad, believers and non-believers – will perish. Therefore, we should not only care for our own wellbeing (material and spiritual), but also for the wellbeing of all the others. When we believe in God, we believe that there is a reason why people are poor, or sick, or evil. We thus realize that we are able to help them.
When we understand God – when we see all the consequences of our behavior –, we realize that it is better not to do to others what is hateful to us. ‘How’ we achieve our objectives is very important. When we do not respect certain rules – do not kill, do not steal, do not lie, etc. – we will sooner or later suffer the consequences. The end never justifies the means.


domingo, 17 de mayo de 2015

AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT: THE BIBLE AND ITS SECRETS

The Bible is a book of wisdom. It invites the reader to ask certain questions whose answers lead to new questions, and this dynamic enables him to discover its secrets and attain wisdom. Its main protagonist is God. God refers to the forces that govern the universe. When one understands God, one understands why things happen the way they do. To be able to discover why things occur the way they do, one must however consider the idea that everything in the universe is based on the principle of cause and effect.
The Bible is special. Although only people with a questioning mind (seekers) can discover its secrets, all people can benefit from its stories as they help to improve their relations with the other people and with the environment. Hillel, a famous Jewish religious leader of the first century BC, said that the Bible teaches us not to do to others what is hateful to us. He considered that the Bible teaches us empathy; that its stories encourage us to put ourselves in the place of other people (our opponents).
The main idea of the Bible, which is often overlooked, is that our ancestors once lived in harmony and that they put an end to it by changing their diet: Adam and Eve, who were vegetarians in the days of paradise, were expelled from it for eating a forbidden fruit. Therefore, people who would like to live in harmony with the other people and with their environment should question the omnivore diet and wonder what the forbidden fruit refers to.
What the Bible says is not necessarily true. It is not because the Bible claims to tell the truth, that what it says is true. When someone writes on a wall, “He who reads this is stupid”, one has to be real stupid to believe this.
It is not because Genesis associates harmony with a vegetarian diet that all people whose religion is based on this first book of the Bible – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – should become vegetarians. However, when one longs for harmony – for a paradise on earth or one after death – it makes a lot of sense to reflect upon the possible benefits of such a diet, and even more when one considers that the Bible is a sacred book. One reason for becoming a vegetarian is empathy – vegetarians are able to put themselves in the position of the animals people feed on – and that is essential for living in harmony with the other people.
It is also not because religious authorities claim that the Bible holds the word of God and says the truth, that we should believe this. Like all other people, authorities make mistakes. Whereas most people accept what authorities say – believers accept what religious authorities say; sceptics and cynics accept what scientific authorities say –, people with a questioning mind evaluate ideas for themselves. They question religious authorities as much as scientific authorities.
When we accept that the Bible is not an authority by itself, we can read it like we read whatever other book. Instead of immediately judging whether its information is realistic are not – the old ages of the patriarchs, for instance –, we can wonder why the author invented them and what they contribute to the stories. One of the consequences of these old ages is that many generations coincided in time.
When we read the Bible with a questioning mind, we find that often what we at first think the Bible says, which is what religious authorities say it says, and often what that book makes us believe it says, is not necessarily what it really says. Genesis, for instance, does not say that Adam and Eve were the first people. It only says that they were the first people who put an end to harmony.
The Bible also does not say that Cain begat Irad. It says that Cain knew his wife and that she conceived and gave birth to Enoch. Therefore, this Enoch may be the same as the one we find in the genealogy that goes from Adam to Noah. Once we realize that the Bible (Genesis) suggests that Yared begat Enoch from Cain’s wife, we discover that the genealogies in this book refer to several cases of incest, endogamy and extramarital relations.
An example of an incestuous relation is that of Rebekah, the wife of Isaac and the mother of Jacob, who are direct ancestors of King David and of Jesus. When we process the information regarding the genealogies in Genesis we discover that Milcah had Rebekah from her son Betuel. Since Milcah was the sister of Lot, and Genesis says that he committed incest with his two daughters, this discovery should not surprise us.
Can one find in the Bible whatever one wants to find? The fact that in the past, people have used the Bible both to defend and to condemn the same idea – slavery, for instance – shows that this book can be interpreted in many ways. However, this does not mean that one can find in it whatever one wants to find. One can not find, for instance, that Adam and Eve ate other creatures in the days of paradise. What is true, however, is that one can ignore in the Bible whatever one wants to ignore. One can ignore that Genesis asociates harmony with a vegetarian diet. One can ignore that the genealogies in the Bible refer to incest, endogamy and extramarital relations.
Wisdom is not so much about knowing a lot of things, but about processing information right. To discover the secrets in the genealogies that appear in the Bible, we not only have to process all the information these books offer us regarding the familie ties between its different protagonists, but also take into account that because of the high ages several generations coincided in time.
Ignorance is not about not knowing a lot of things – Albert Einstein said, “We are all ignorant, but do not all ignore the same things” –, but about deliberately ignoring information. That is why ‘ignorant’ is a synonym for ‘stupid’. Some people know a lot of things, but ignore what is most important: that everybody is somehow family of everybody else and that the resources should enable all of us to make a living. They deliberately ignore that since the earth is limited, and therefore as well its resources, the bigger portion of the resources some appropriate, the smaller the portion that is left for all the others.
People also deliberately ignore certain information in the Bible. Religious authorities often stress the fact that God expelled Adam and Eve from paradise for eating a forbidden fruit, but ignore the fact that Adam and Eve were vegetarians in the days of paradise and that Genesis therefore asociates harmony with a vegetarian diet, and the end of harmony with a change in their diet.
Christian authorities have often been so much attracted to material wealth (they have befriended the rich and have been rich themselves), that they ignored that Jesus said that it is easier for a camel to make it through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter paradise. They have also often judged people, thus ignoring that Jesus said, “Do not judge, or you too will be judged.”
Wisdom requires humility. To be able to discover the answer to certain mysteries, we first have to recognize that there are mysteries; that there are things that we do not yet understand. Arrogance goes together with ignorance. People who can not accept that there are ideas that they do not yet understand either ignore them, consider that they make no sense, or give them an unsatisfactory explanation (by creating a dogma or an axioma).
Authorities – religious or scientific – are not reknown for their humility. On the contrary, they are often arrogant. Hans Christian Anderson’s story of the Emperor’s Suit explains very well how intellectuals can fool themselves. When the emperor’s tailor says that he has made a suit for the emperor from a special material that only intelligent people can see, all praise its beauty although the tailor hadn’t used any fabric at all. It is therefore a child that points out that the emperor walks around naked. A lot of people have such an ego that they are unable to admit that there are ideas that they do not understand.
A lot of the authorities that study the genealogies in the Bible claim that these make no sense. That is arrogant. They ignore the fact that because of extramarital relations some lineages are real and others are supposed and that the Bible recognizes this reality. They ignore that because of this Jews consider that someone is a Jews when his mother is a Jew. One can have doubts about the father, but not about the mother.
Whereas religious authorities are arrogant for not admitting that they do not understand certain ideas in the Bible and converting their erroneous interpretations into dogmas, scientific authorities are arrogant for not only questioning these erroneous interpretations, but also the Bible and religion itself. Religious and scientific authorities both ignore that the Bible holds secrets and that originally religion encouraged people to discover these secrets.
Most people find it difficult to consider that the Bible holds secrets because they can neither accept that there are ideas that they can not yet understand, nor that someone would prefer to keep certain ideas a secret from them.
Why does the Bible (Genesis) hold secrets? Why does it sometimes make people believe it says one thing when in reality it says something quite different? This is because not all people can immediately understand its wisdom – to grasp certain ideas people have to be ready for them / there is fast food, but no fast wisdom – and because it is better to avoid that certain knowledge falls into the hands of people who would use it to harm other people or their environment.
The Bible was created as a Trojan horse to help pagans become familiar with the idea of an only God. Its authors wanted its messianic message – restoring harmony on earth –to reach as many people as possible. This message not only had to be attractive to the poor, who would benefit most when people restored harmony, but also to the rich and powerful, who could easily regard a Messiah as a threat, and therefore oppose the messianic religions that are based on the Bible.
The Bible gives a lot of importance to vegetarianism, but does not openly condemn eating other creatures because it was created to attract people, and not to scare them away. If the Bible had questioned the omnivore diet too openly, our ancestors would not have accepted it as a sacred book.          
The religious authorities who wrote those books were very different from the religious authorities that later appropriated them and interpreted them. Those who wrote the important books of the NT, for instance, were Jews who had discovered the secrets in the OT and who were therefore familiar with books that hold secrets and with the idea that someone enlightened is able to create a mystery that reveals itself many generations later. The Christian authorities who later interpreted those books, and who are responsible for several dogmas and misinterpretations, were no longer Jews, but descendants of pagans who were still very familiar with previous beliefs such as, for instance, that of a God being born of a virgin.
The Bible interacts with mankind’s evolution. When we reflect upon our evolution we see that the creation of nuclear weapons is a milestone in mankind’s history. It not only teaches us that we are capable of destroying ourselves, but also that a society that doesn’t live in harmony – like ours – is eventually bound to do so: weapons continually become more sophisticated and once there are weapons of mass destruction it is only a matter of time before they are used. This does not mean that we will destroy ourselves in the near future, but that to guarantee our survival we must discover why we have conflicts with each other and with our environment.
Technology enables an ever smaller group of people to get hold of an increasingly larger proportion of all the available resources, thus creating many problems for everyone else. This in turn leads to increasing levels of tension among people, and between them and their environment. And when this tension increases too much, it explodes.
Peace is not the same as harmony. Peace eventually leads to war because it does not put an end to the struggle for the resources. The only difference is that during days of peace people struggle for the resources by keeping themselves to certain rules. Since people who are cut off from the resources will eventually question the benefits of keeping themselves to these rules, peace hold the germ of the next conflict.
That a society that doesn’t live in harmony is eventually bound to destroy itself is the most important lesson that people have to learn. Whereas our intellectuals –scientists, philosophers, politicians, theologians– ignore this, Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, recognizes this reality: 10 generations after putting an end to harmony (Paradise), our ancestors almost completely destroyed themselves (the Great Flood). After that catastrophe, mankind's evolution started all over again. The survivors went on with their lives as before. And since they continued to live in conflict with each other and with their environment we now find ourselves again close to our self-destruction.
Since today mankind is able to destroy itself, we can wonder whether it has already done so in the past. The fact that Genesis recognizes the most important lesson that mankind has to learn, tells us that it was written by someone who foresaw that one day mankind would find itself on the verge of destroying itself and that that he wrote Genesis to help mankind avoid doing so. How? By not only informing them of the ultimate effect, but also of the ultimate cause of not living in harmony.
Since the Bible interacts with mankind’s evolution, it is now that we find ourselves close to destroying ourselves that this book reveals its secrets. The main question this book encourages us to ask is what the forbidden fruit refers to – Genesis does not say it is an apple – and that is the same as asking why we have conflicts with each other and with our environment.
Since the Messiah is expected to restore harmony on Earth, we can assume that he will tell us what is the ultimate cause of our conflicts or what the forbidden fruit refers to.
Christians assume that Jesus was the Messiah. The Jews find this incomprehensible, since he did not restore harmony on earth, which is what they expected of the Messiah. This idea however makes sense when we consider the principle of reincarnation and assume that a reincarnation of Jesus – his Second Arrival – will restore harmony on earth.
The Apocalypses associates Jesus’ second arrival with the end of times – when mankind is close to destroying itself – and with a revelation: whereas its last book refers to the end of times, Apocalypses is greek for ‘revelation’. The Messiah that the Jews are awaiting is the same person as Jesus’ Second Arrival that the Christians are awaiting. We thus see that an important idea from religions that are not based on the Bible help us understand the secrets in that book.
In regards to the secrets in the Bible, we must also take into account that the first books of the OT were originally written in ancient Hebrew, a consonant language. When centuries later the vowels were added, these texts were interpreted, as the same combination of consonants often led to several words.
It may surprise many that ancient Hebrew held no vowels, but also the first alphabet did not recognize vowels. This is because our subconscious, which functions like a very powerfull database, files words – associates them with each other – in function of the consonants that compose them. Therefore, in all vocabularies words with the same combination of consonants have a lot in common with each other. This means that we must associate ‘genesis’ (Greek: beginning) with ‘gnosis’ (Greek: hidden knowledge).

Now that we are referring to the secrets of our vocabulary we can point out that calling the Bible a ‘sacred’ book originally meant to recognize that it holds secrets  –  ‘sacred’ and ‘secret’ both come from the verb ‘to segregate’ – and that ‘religion’, which come from the Latin word ‘relegere’ and means ‘to re-read’, refers to reading the Bible time and again to discover its secrets.