Genesis says
that Adam and Eve were vegetarians before they were expelled from paradise.
This may not mean much when we consider it a fable1, but is relevant
when we consider it the work of someone enlightened.2,3
This first book
of the Bible says that people once
lived in harmony, that they put an end to it by eating a forbidden fruit, and that
ten generations later they almost completely destroyed themselves. It thus recognizes the most important lesson
mankind has to learn: the fact that a society that doesn’t live in harmony is
eventually bound to destroy itself. The author of Genesis foresaw something
that we can only comprehend today.
When we
reflect upon evolution we see that technology makes weapons become
continually more sophisticated, while at the same time it enables an always
smaller percentage of the world population to appropriate an always larger
percentage of all available resources, thus increasing the tension between the
different groups of people, and between them and their environment. Now that we
have weapons of mass-destruction, mankind’s self-destruction can occure any
moment.
To assure mankind’s survival,
we have to ask why we have conflicts, which is the same as asking what the
forbidden fruit refers to. By telling us that Adam and Eve were vegetarians
before their expulsion from paradise, Genesis associates harmony with a
vegetarian diet and suggests that a change in mankind’s diet put an end to
harmony.
Jews, Christians and Muslims long for paradise because
of Genesis, but ignore that Genesis associates paradise – a harmonious society –
with a vegetarian diet. This is because they consider that the Bible holds the
word of God and have a ‘pagan’ understanding of God.
People who see God as a father (or ruler) who must
be obeyed at all times, allow God to be capricious. They accept that He can
forbid something or change His mind without any reason. What matters for them is
not why there was a forbidden fruit or what it referred to, but the fact that
God forbade eating it. Instead of seeing the end of paradise as a result of
eating the forbidden fruit, they regard it as the punishment for having
disobeyed God.
God first prescribed a vegetarian diet to Adam and Eve, but later
allowed Noah to eat meat. This is why Jews,
Christians and Muslims eat other creatures, thus ignoring that Genesis
associates harmony with a vegetarian diet. However, this second dietary law conceals a reality to
those who do not ask why God changed his mind.
People who
don’t question the God4 in Genesis, base themselves on this second dietary
law to ignore the former. They are so pleased that God allowed them to eat meat,
that they do not care why He changed His mind. They do not pay attention to the
fact that God gave Noah the second law after exclaiming: "Never again will
I curse the earth because of man, because the plans of the human heart are evil
from their childhood. Never again will I hurt every living thing as I have
done."
God was clearly
not pleased with Noah. He had a good reason for being disappointed. He had
asked Noah to take the animals with him on the ark so that also they would
survive the flood, and the first thing Noah did upon landing was to offer a
sacrifice of some of those animals.
The second
dietary law says: "Everything that lives and moves will be yours to eat”.
It not only allows eating animals, but also humans. Since later it says:
"But you will not eat the meat with its soul, that is, with its blood. And
I promise to demand account of your own blood. I shall demand it of every
animal and of man. All of them and each of them will be demanded account for
the human soul. He who sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed,
for in the image of God was man created", God allows Noah and his
descendants to eat other creatures to recover their human soul. Once they recover
their human soul, they no longer need to eat other creatures.
Christians justify
their omnivore diet by referring to the second dietary law, but eat blood although
this second dietary law forbids doing so. This demonstrates that one can ignore
in the Bible whatever one wants to ignore.
A lot of
people claim that the opposite is true: that one can
find whatever one wants to find in the Bible. The
fact that in the past people have used the Bible both to defend and to condemn
the same idea –slavery, alcohol, etc.– shows that this ‘sacred book’ can indeed
be interpreted in many ways. But that doesn’t mean that one can find whatever
one wants to find in it. For instance, one cannot find that in the days
of Paradise Adam and Eve ate animals.
What is true, however, is that one can ignore in the Bible –and in life in
general– whatever one wants to ignore. For instance, one can ignore that God forbade eating blood
or that Genesis associates paradise with a vegetarian diet.
In the
dietary law that God gives to Noah, He refers to the dietary law given earlier on
to Adam and Eve. While in this second law God indicates: "Everything that
lives and moves will be yours to eat: I give you everything, the same as I have given you the green herbs"
(Gn9:3), in the first law He says: "Behold, I have given you all
seed-bearing plants that are upon the face of the whole earth, as well as every
tree that bears fruit that holds seeds, this will be your food. And to all the
wild animals on earth, and to all the birds of heaven and all the living
creatures that creep along the ground, all
the green herbs I give them as food." (Gn1:29-30) The fact that God
had given the green herbs to the animals means that he regarded Noah as an
animal. This explains why God tells Noah and his family to claim their human
blood (his human soul).
That Genesis
associates paradise with a vegetarian diet should not surprise us. Harmony
among people requires empathy –Hillel, a famous Jewish religious leader of the
first century BC, said the Bible teaches us not do to others what is hateful to
us– and vegetarians are obviously able to put themselves in the place of others,
since that is one of the reasons for not eating animals. Besides, paradise is
not only for humans (or only for the rich, or for people from a particular race
or with a particular religion, etc...). Living in harmony means to respect the
environment and the other people and the other creatures of course form part of
it.
Since our childhood
we get used to a particular diet and so it is so hard to question what we eat
or do not eat. That is why Genesis does not openly condemn eating other
creatures. In case the Bible had done so, pagans would never have accepted it as
a 'sacred book'.
In the past,
some people did become aware of the fact that Genesis associates paradise with
a vegetarian diet. Whereas Daniel, an
OT book about the days of the Babylonian deportation, mentions several
Israelites of royal and noble family that that were vegetarians and stayed away
from alcohol (Dn1), the NT suggests that also the early Christians –Jesus was
of noble descent– were vegetarians (and stayed away from alcohol): Saint Paul
says in Romans: ‘It is not good to
eat meat’ (Rm14:21).
The defenders of the omnivore diet can oppose that if
vegetarianism was really an important issue, God would have forbidden eating
other creatures. But they ignore that in the days of paradise God neither forbade to kill, to
steal, to lie, etc. That one prohibition –staying away from the forbidden
fruit– was apparently enough to guarantee harmony. Keeping themselves to that
single rule enabled them to respect the environment, the other humans and the other
creatures.
We can
wonder whether eating the forbidden fruit started a chainreaction of violence
leading to more violence5. When we reflect upon history we see that
we continuosly make the same mistakes, which means that we do not learn
everything there is to learn from our experiences6 and there is thus
something wrong with our understanding of reality and therefore as well as with
our perception of reality7. To find out why we have conflicts, we
only have to ask what substances alter our perception of reality in such a way
that we focus so much on certain aspects that we ignore others…
Bruno Lernout, a self-taught seeker, is the author of secretsinthebible.blogspot.com.es
and of secretsinthebible.com.
1 Science doesn’t contradict the
Bible, but only a particular interpretation of that book. Adam and Eve, for
instance, do not represent the first people, but only the first people that ate
the forbidden fruit and thus put an end to harmony.
2 Genesis is a sacred book because it
holds secrets.The word ‘sacred’ has the same origin as ‘secret’ and derives from the latin
verb ‘segregare’. Our ancestors called the part of the temple that only the
high priest could enter ‘sacred’ because it was ‘segregated’ (separated) from
the rest. Since what is segregated conceals something from other people, the
ideas ‘sacred’ and ‘secret’ were associated with each other from the very
beginning.
3 Mystics associate the Greek words ‘genesis’ (beginning) and ‘gnosis’ (hidden wisdom / comprehension) with each other because they have the same consonants.
4. We can consider the forces that govern the universe as God. There are
many laws of nature, but all are based on the principle of cause and effect.
5. Violence causes traumas and these are passed on from one generation
to the other and eventually create more violence.
6. When one learns everything there is to learn from an experiences one
can avoid it to happen again in the future.
7. We obtain our understanding of reality from our perception of
reality.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario