Whereas Saint Matthew offers Jesus’ real lineage, since it is based on
the ‘father begon son’ principle, Saint Luke offers Jesus’ supposed lineage,
since it starts with, “When he began, Jesus was about thirty years old; being
the son, as it was thought, of
Joseph, son of Heli, son of Mathat..” Saint Luke not only tells us that people
thought that Jesus was the son of Joseph, but also that they thought that
Joseph was the son of Heli, Heli the son of Mathat, etc. This explains why both
genealogies differ from each other. It explains why, for instance, according to
Saint Matthew Joseph’s father was Jacob and according to Saint Luke it was
Heli.
Christian authorities have assumed that the ‘as it was thought’ in the
gospel of Saint Luke and the ‘Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary who gave
birth to Jesus’ in the gospel of Saint Matthew are there because Jesus was born
of a virgin, but they have never explained in a satisfactory why these
genealogies differ so much from each other and, for instance, offer a different
father for Joseph.
When we compare Jesus’ real lineage in the gospel of Saint Matthew with Jesus’
supposed lineage in the gospel of Saint Luke, we find that the latter offers an
additional generation between Adam and Abraham. Whereas Saint Luke indicates that people thought that Selah was the son
of Cainan and that Cainan was the son of Arphaxad*, Genesis says that
Arpachshad begat Shelah. This suggests that Arpachshad (we often find different
spellings for the same name in the Bible) first had his son Cainan and later,
when he became an adult, had Shelah from his daughter-in-law, Cainan’s wife.
Saint Luke offers an additional generation not only between Henoc and
Abraham, but also between Abraham and David (14 generations in Matthew as
opposed to 15 in Luke). Whereas Saint Luke indicates that people thought that
Amminadab was the son of Admin, son of Arni, son of Hezron, Saint Matthew says
that Hezron begat Ram and Ram begat Amminadab. This suggests that Aram begat
Amminadab from his daughter-in-law, Admin’s wife.
These two examples of father-in-law and daugther-in-law relationships in
Jesus’ lineage demonstrate that also Saint Luke knew that Mary had Jesus from
her father-in-law Jacob.
(*Saint Luke must have been
familiar with the genealogies in Genesis)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario