Jesus
said to his disciples, “…you will come to know the truth, and the truth will
set you free” (Jn 8:32), because he foresaw that for a long time Christians
would believe in an idea that is false. Since this message appears not long
after the episode of the adulterous woman,* and a bit later the Pharisees tell
him, “…we were not born illegitimate” (Jn8:41), it is clear that he referred to
who was his father.
The
belief in the dogma of Jesus’ virgin birth has turned Christians into slaves, because
they do not really have faith in this dogma, but in the authorities that defend
this dogma, and their faith in authorities goes together with a lack of faith
in themselves.
When we
assume that authorities understand ideas that we don’t understand, how do we
know whether they really understand these ideas or only pretend to do so? How
do we then know whether they look after everybody’s well-being or only look after
their own well-being?
People
have followed authorities – I not only refer to religious authorities – like
sheep follow a shepherd without realizing that the shepherd only protects his
sheep against wild animals because he plans to eat them himself.
Jesus said, “The truth will set you free” because the fact that the
gospel of Saint Matthew made the religious authorities come to erroneous
conclusions, teaches us that instead of trusting authorities we must learn to
understand the world we live in by ourselves.
Faith is
positive when it refers to the future, because then helps to achieve objectives;
but it is negative when it refers to the past – like Jesus’ virgin birth –,
because then it encourages people to ignore all information that contradicts our
‘assumption’. Since wisdom comes from processing information right – seeing how
new information affects all previously obtained information –, having faith in
dogmas turns people into ignorants.
Both the dogmas of religion and the axioms of science are ideas that are
supposed to be right but that have never been proved to be so. The difference is
that whereas scientists realize that eventually a particular axiom may be
proved to be false**, theologians consider that time can only demonstrate a dogma
to be right.
Ignorance and arrogance often go together and are certainly at the
origin and defense of the dogma of Jesus’ birth. When the gospel of Saint
Matthew was discovered, the authorities of Christianity assumed it said that
Jesus was born of a virgin, but they did not process all its information right.
For instance, they did not look up what was special about the four women in Saint
Matthew’s genealogy for Jesus, and also did not check the different prophecies
that Saint Matthew refers to. If they had done so, they would have realized
that whereas Saint Matthew refers to a prophecy regarding a virgin giving birth
to a son, the original text in Isaiah refers to a young woman giving birth to a
son. (Is7:14).***
(*Read
the article ‘The adulterous woman’.)
(** The most important axiom says that two
straight lines running parallel with each never cross each other. Wondering
about how two straight parallel lines behave is the same as inquiring about the
nature of the universe; since that is the space in which we project these lines.
In case this axiom is false, we have to restate our ideas about the universe.)
(***The belief in the dogma of Jesus’ virgin birth made
that when Christians found that Isaiah referred to a young woman, they assumed this
prophet made a mistake.)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario